Re: Providing catalog view to pg_hba.conf file - Patch submission

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Providing catalog view to pg_hba.conf file - Patch submission
Date: 2015-05-04 20:48:10
Message-ID: 5547DB0A.2020904@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/1/15 12:33 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-04-08 19:19:29 +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
>> I'm not sure what the best way to handle the hand-off from patch
>> contribution to reviewer/committer. If I start tweaking things then
>> you send in a new version it's actually more work to resolve the
>> conflicts. I think at this point it's easiest if I just take it from
>> here.
>
> Are you intending to commit this?

It still looks quite dubious to me.

The more I test this, the more fond I grow of the idea of having this
information available in SQL. But I'm also growing more perplexed by
how this the file is mapped to a table. It just isn't a good match.

For instance: What is keyword_databases? Why is it an array? Same for
keyword_users. How can I know whether a given database or user matches
a keyword? What is compare_method? (Should perhaps be
keyword_address?) Why is compare method set to "mask" when a hostname
is set? (Column order is also a bit confusing here.) I'd also like
options to be jsonb instead of a text array.

Ultimately, I don't see how this is better than just showing the raw
file. I don't see a sensible way to compute answers to questions such
as "What is the authentication method for user X from IP address Y." If
I can't do that, what's the point of having a processed version?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-05-04 21:16:42 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT syntax issues
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-05-04 20:23:30 Re: Use outerPlanState() consistently in executor code