Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5

From: Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance\(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Gabrielle Roth" <gorthx(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
Date: 2008-12-21 09:29:46
Message-ID: 552F108E-9732-4ED6-B45D-6C651C63565E@gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Dec 20, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Gregory Stark wrote:

> "Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
>> To recap, dbt2 is a fair-use derivative of the TPC-C benchmark.  We
>> are using a 1000 warehouse database, which amounts to about 100GB of
>> raw text data.
>
> Really? Do you get conforming results with 1,000 warehouses? What's  
> the 95th
> percentile response time?

No, the results are not conforming.  You and others have pointed that  
out already.  The 95th percentile response time are calculated on each  
page of the previous links.

I find your questions a little odd for the input I'm asking for.  Are  
you under the impression we are trying to publish benchmarking  
results?  Perhaps this is a simple misunderstanding?

Regards,
Mark

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Stefano Dal PraDate: 2008-12-21 10:15:12
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs Oracle
Previous:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2008-12-21 08:51:19
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs Oracle

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group