Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Date: 2005-04-29 14:00:57
Message-ID: 5510.1114783257@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
> In the last exciting episode, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) wrote:
>> o integrated auto-vacuum (Bruce)

> If this can kick off a vacuum of a Very Large Table at an unfortunate
> time, this can turn out to be a prety painful misfeature.

[ shrug... ]  You'll always be able to turn it off if you don't want it.
I'm not sure that we'll be ready to turn it on by default even in 8.1.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-04-29 14:09:43
Subject: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Previous:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2005-04-29 12:29:32
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-04-29 14:08:30
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] bcc32 libpq compile problem
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-04-29 13:59:33
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] bcc32 libpq compile problem

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group