Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Date: 2005-04-29 14:00:57
Message-ID: 5510.1114783257@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
> In the last exciting episode, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) wrote:
>> o integrated auto-vacuum (Bruce)

> If this can kick off a vacuum of a Very Large Table at an unfortunate
> time, this can turn out to be a prety painful misfeature.

[ shrug... ] You'll always be able to turn it off if you don't want it.
I'm not sure that we'll be ready to turn it on by default even in 8.1.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-04-29 14:09:43 Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2005-04-29 12:29:32 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-04-29 14:08:30 Re: [INTERFACES] bcc32 libpq compile problem
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-04-29 13:59:33 Re: [INTERFACES] bcc32 libpq compile problem