Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: syatskevich(at)n21lab(dot)gosniias(dot)msk(dot)ru, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)
Date: 2003-05-26 20:16:54
Message-ID: 5496.1053980214@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> The reason it is PGC_USERSET is because we imagined people might want to
> increase the amount of information sent to the server logs, and we don't
> have an _increase_only_ restriction capability.  However, maybe it
> should be PGC_SUSET.

Yeah, probably so.  Particularly with the 7.4 error message additions,
it'd be possible to make the logs very verbose indeed, which might be
seen as a form of attack (or at least a good way to hide your traces).

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Larry RosenmanDate: 2003-05-26 20:42:16
Subject: Re: pl/sh
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-05-26 19:05:43
Subject: Re: Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Sean ChittendenDate: 2003-05-26 23:10:50
Subject: pg_class_aclcheck: relation [oid] not found...
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-05-26 19:05:43
Subject: Re: Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Michael BrusserDate: 2003-05-26 21:07:58
Subject: Re: Removing a user's password
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-05-26 19:05:43
Subject: Re: Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group