KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> writes:
> If my understanding is correct, the following patch can fix the matters.
> ! if (ExecContextForcesOids(ps, &hasoid) &&
> ! hasoid != tupdesc->tdhasoid)
> return false;
> --- 243,249 ----
> ! if (ExecContextForcesOids(ps, &hasoid))
> return false;
This isn't fixing anything, it's just making the executor stick its
head in the sand.
regards, tom lane