Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_dump locking info

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump locking info
Date: 2010-08-15 21:13:53
Message-ID: 5448.1281906833@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> And whilst I was perusing the docs, I also noticed this on
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/backup.html
>> 
>> "Each has its own strengths and weaknesses. Each is discussed in turn below."
>> 
>> That sentence is at the bottom of the page. It would make sense in a
>> PDF, but might be a confusing in section-by-section HTML
>> documentation.

> I don't find it so, but I suppose if it's a big deal we could change
> it to read "in the following sections".

Yeah, that's what I was thinking of doing in response to Thom's gripe.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-08-15 23:05:43
Subject: Re: pg_dump locking info
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-08-15 21:01:30
Subject: Re: pg_dump locking info

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group