Re: [HACKERS] Re: New notices?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: New notices?
Date: 1999-09-29 23:38:37
Message-ID: 5430.938648317@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
>> Tom Lane and I agreed we need to issue a NOTICE for this type of
>> auto-FROM creation.

> OK, but I may happily break it when implementing table and column
> aliases for join syntax. Don't know yet what the ramifications will
> be...

Well, it's certainly a second-order feature. How about you leave the
message turned off until the dust has settled from JOIN, and then we
can see what it takes to make it work right...

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-09-29 23:48:14 Re: [HACKERS] shared memory 651, freebsd 2.2.7
Previous Message Jason Venner 1999-09-29 22:26:44 shared memory 651, freebsd 2.2.7