Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: Richard Huxton <richardh(at)archonet(dot)com>,pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list
Date: 2003-06-10 21:28:43
Message-ID: 5408.1055280523@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Given that we're running out of time, I wasn't going to touch any of the 
> comments in PostgreSQL.conf.sample.   Instead, I was going to leave the 
> comments as-is, and post extensive comments on Techdocs before 7.4
> beta.  

I doubt anyone would object to improving the comments during beta; so
you don't need to consider that part something that has to be done
before feature freeze.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2003-06-10 21:29:42
Subject: Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2003-06-10 20:57:24
Subject: Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2003-06-10 21:29:42
Subject: Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2003-06-10 21:27:30
Subject: Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2003-06-10 21:29:42
Subject: Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list
Previous:From: Sean ChittendenDate: 2003-06-10 21:25:49
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group