Le 24 juin 09 à 18:29, Alvaro Herrera a écrit :
> Oleg Bartunov wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Chris St Denis wrote:
>>> Is tsvector_update_trigger() smart enough to not bother updating a
>>> tsvector if the text in that column has not changed?
>> no, you should do check yourself. There are several examples in
>> mailing lists.
> Or you could try using the supress_redundant_updates_trigger()
> that has been included in 8.4 (should be easy to backport)
But it won't handle the case where some other random column has
changed, but the UPDATE is not affecting the text indexed...
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Chris St Denis||Date: 2009-06-25 04:03:08|
|Subject: Re: tsvector_update_trigger performance?|
|Previous:||From: Scott Marlowe||Date: 2009-06-24 17:42:08|
|Subject: Re: cluster index on a table|