Re: [HACKERS] GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes

From: Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes
Date: 2014-04-30 20:40:55
Message-ID: 53615FD7.5020500@darrenduncan.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-students

Is there a good reason for this thread being copied to the advocacy list? It
seems to me just on topic for hackers. -- Darren Duncan

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-04-30 21:41:57 Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2014-04-30 20:05:56 Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-04-30 21:35:24 Re: bgworker crashed or not?
Previous Message Gavin Flower 2014-04-30 20:27:49 Re: Display of timestamp in pg_dump custom format

Browse pgsql-students by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-04-30 21:41:57 Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2014-04-30 20:05:56 Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes