Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: proof concept: do statement parametrization

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Florian Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proof concept: do statement parametrization
Date: 2010-07-04 14:28:47
Message-ID: 53062.65.184.115.211.1278253727.squirrel@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, July 4, 2010 9:58 am, Tom Lane wrote:

>
> BTW, we intentionally didn't put any provision for parameters into DO
> originally.  What's changed to alter that decision?
>

Nothing that I know of, I think there is just a little impatience here. I
think the consensus was that we needed to get some experience of DO in the
field before looking at a parameter  mechanism. I still think that's the
correct position.

cheers

andrew




In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2010-07-04 14:43:54
Subject: Re: proof concept: do statement parametrization
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-07-04 13:58:04
Subject: Re: proof concept: do statement parametrization

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group