On Sun, July 4, 2010 9:58 am, Tom Lane wrote:

>
> BTW, we intentionally didn't put any provision for parameters into DO
> originally.  What's changed to alter that decision?
>

Nothing that I know of, I think there is just a little impatience here. I
think the consensus was that we needed to get some experience of DO in the
field before looking at a parameter  mechanism. I still think that's the
correct position.

cheers

andrew

In response to

• Re: proof concept: do statement parametrization at 2010-07-04 13:58:04 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Pavel Stehule	Date: 2010-07-04 14:43:54
	Subject: Re: proof concept: do statement parametrization
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2010-07-04 13:58:04
	Subject: Re: proof concept: do statement parametrization