Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> I don't really get it. We had a voting and I think I saw a
> clear enough result with #1, transactional behaviour, as the
> winner. Maybe I missed something, but what's this
> disscussion about?
We agreed on transactional behavior ... but Scott is proposing a variant
that was not considered earlier, and it seems worth considering.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Marc G. Fournier||Date: 2002-04-29 18:52:19|
|Subject: Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction|
|Previous:||From: Neil Conway||Date: 2002-04-29 18:41:33|
|Subject: Re: Vacation in May|