Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Character set conversion

From: "Daniel T(dot) Staal" <DStaal(at)usa(dot)net>
To: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Character set conversion
Date: 2008-07-24 01:36:58
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-novice
On Mon, July 21, 2008 10:16 am, Tom Lane wrote:

> It wouldn't be too hard if you don't mind running a custom Postgres
> build; but if you do, then the best answer might be to cannibalize one of
> the existing encoding names and just replace its conversion procedures.

Actually, I'd recommend not doing that.  Instead, put in your encoding as
a new encoding, and send a diff of your changes to the Postgres team.  I
bet next release it would be a supported encoding, and you would be able
to upgrade without any issues...

Daniel T. STaal

This email copyright the author.  Unless otherwise noted, you
are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use
the contents for non-commercial purposes.  This copyright will
expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years,
whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of
local copyright law.

In response to

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Wright, GeorgeDate: 2008-07-24 12:51:13
Subject: Re: libpq question
Previous:From: Wright, GeorgeDate: 2008-07-22 20:00:32
Subject: libpq question

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group