Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry

From: Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry
Date: 2011-05-20 20:28:09
Message-ID: 519D14DA-AE5A-4A95-AE8A-DE6C0C40A200@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www


On May 20, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Dave Page wrote:

> 2011/5/20 Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
>>
>> On May 20, 2011, at 1:09 PM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 15:36 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think we'd want to try to avoid doing that as it would require
>>>> policing to ensure inappropriate content wasn't uploaded.
>>>
>>> (I quoted wrong email in my previous reply, sorry)
>>>
>>> We already allow *everyone* to distribute their tarballs through our FTP
>>> mirror network...
>>
>> Why won't we direct them to PGXN? It seems to have a really nice way to store/discover PostgreSQL related projects.
>
> That might be appropriate for some packages, but certainly not all.

I'm wondering what are these 'inappropriate' packages. Any examples?

--
Alexey Klyukin
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2011-05-20 20:29:42 Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry
Previous Message Dave Page 2011-05-20 20:21:05 Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry