Re: [GENERAL] Missing variable "role" in "pg_settings"?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Missing variable "role" in "pg_settings"?
Date: 2005-12-04 04:35:26
Message-ID: 5166.1133670926@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers pgsql-general

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Based on this email, should we be showing ROLE from SHOW ALL?

Only if you think we should be showing session_authorization too.
That was marked "no_show_all" quite a long time ago, and we have
not got complaints about it...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume LELARGE 2005-12-04 23:35:38 Re: New french po updates
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-04 04:22:10 Re: [GENERAL] Missing variable "role" in "pg_settings"?

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2005-12-04 04:58:29 Re: 8.03 versus 8.04
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-12-04 04:29:43 Re: New.* and old.* as function arguments within rules