Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] Missing variable "role" in "pg_settings"?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Missing variable "role" in "pg_settings"?
Date: 2005-12-04 04:35:26
Message-ID: 5166.1133670926@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackerspgsql-general
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Based on this email, should we be showing ROLE from SHOW ALL?

Only if you think we should be showing session_authorization too.
That was marked "no_show_all" quite a long time ago, and we have
not got complaints about it...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Guillaume LELARGEDate: 2005-12-04 23:35:38
Subject: Re: New french po updates
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-04 04:22:10
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Missing variable "role" in "pg_settings"?

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Jan WieckDate: 2005-12-04 04:58:29
Subject: Re: 8.03 versus 8.04
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-12-04 04:29:43
Subject: Re: New.* and old.* as function arguments within rules

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group