Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: function source

From: "Wright, George" <George(dot)Wright(at)infimatic(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: function source
Date: 2008-07-11 12:50:08
Message-ID: 51548D6D5BEB57468163194A8C1A0E98C6BE59@MAGPTCPEXC02.na.mag-ias.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice
So does that mean there is no way to hide the source for procedural
language functions in postgresql?


-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:mailing_lists(at)pandapocket(dot)com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 12:34 PM
To: Wright, George
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] function source

I think that we have some functions that are defined in C.  I'd have to
check the repository to get the source.

-Mark

On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 10:47 -0500, Wright, George wrote:
> Is there a way to hide/encrypt the source for functions I might write
> in any of the procedural languages?
> 
>  
> 
> Doing \df+ <func> shows all of it.
> 
> 


In response to

Responses

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-07-11 14:10:16
Subject: Re: Dataimport from remote db
Previous:From: Schoenit, Tobias AT/BHL-ZTPSDate: 2008-07-11 11:34:04
Subject: Dataimport from remote db

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group