| From: | "Derek Rodner" <derek(dot)rodner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Oracle, MySQL, and PostgreSQL feature comparison - Part 2 |
| Date: | 2007-10-11 17:45:41 |
| Message-ID: | 51494DB187D98F4C88DBEBF1F5F6D42302EF61CC@edb06.mail01.enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Sean Hull over at Database Journal has posted Part 2 of his database
comparison.
Here are links to both parts:
Part 1 -
http://www.databasejournal.com/features/oracle/article.php/3692566
Part 2 -
http://www.databasejournal.com/features/oracle/article.php/3703376
I'd be interested to get the community's take on the portrayal of
Postgres.
Derek
Derek M. Rodner
Director, Product Strategy
EnterpriseDB Corporation
732.331.1333 office
484.252.1943 cell
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-10-11 18:20:20 | Re: Oracle, MySQL, and PostgreSQL feature comparison - Part 2 |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2007-10-11 02:41:20 | Re: We aren't a relational database ... ? |