| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump selectively ignores extension configuration tables |
| Date: | 2013-03-15 00:23:59 |
| Message-ID: | 51426A1F.9080600@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/13/2013 04:16 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>> I think it should dump the user data portion, especially since that
>> matches what pg_dump would do if you did not specify the table or schema.
>
> +1
>
> If you don't have time slots to fix that by then, I will have a look at
> fixing that while in beta.
Here is a patch against 9.1. If there is agreement with the approach
I'll redo for 9.2 and git head and apply.
Joe
--
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| pg_dump_ext_obj.diff | text/x-patch | 2.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2013-03-15 02:25:53 | Assertion failure when promoting node by deleting recovery.conf and restart node |
| Previous Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2013-03-14 23:48:04 | Re: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] |