Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree
Date: 2013-03-08 13:08:02
Message-ID: 5139E2B2.8020105@vmware.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 03.03.2013 19:42, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> This patch only adds one more operator to already committed new opclass.
> Tests already cover this case. Without patch corresponding test leads to
> sequential scan instead of index scan.

Thanks, committed with some trivial cleanup.

> However, I can't see any
> documentation changes about already committed opclass. I think we need a
> documentation update as an separate patch.

Agreed. I think a small mention in the Range Types - Indexing section 
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/rangetypes.html#RANGETYPES-GIST) 
will do.

- Heikki


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2013-03-08 13:28:27
Subject: Re: sql_drop Event Triggerg
Previous:From: Michael PaquierDate: 2013-03-08 13:00:52
Subject: Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group