On 03.03.2013 19:42, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> This patch only adds one more operator to already committed new opclass.
> Tests already cover this case. Without patch corresponding test leads to
> sequential scan instead of index scan.
Thanks, committed with some trivial cleanup.
> However, I can't see any
> documentation changes about already committed opclass. I think we need a
> documentation update as an separate patch.
Agreed. I think a small mention in the Range Types - Indexing section
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2013-03-08 13:28:27|
|Subject: Re: sql_drop Event Triggerg|
|Previous:||From: Michael Paquier||Date: 2013-03-08 13:00:52|
|Subject: Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY|