| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: json api WIP patch |
| Date: | 2013-02-01 00:26:58 |
| Message-ID: | 510B0BD2.4010000@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/31/2013 07:16 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2013, at 2:20 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> I'm happy to take opinions about this, and I expected some bikeshedding, but your reaction is contrary to everything others have told me. Mostly they love the operators.
>>
>> I guess that '~>' and '~>>' would work as well as '->' and '->>'.
> Or +> and +>>, since ~ is set very high and small by some fonts (where the fontmakers though of it as a kind of superscript character).
>
> I suppose that := is out of the question?
>
Even if it were I would not on any account use it. As an old Ada
programmer my mind just revolts at the idea of using this for anything
but assignment.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-02-01 00:32:25 | Re: json api WIP patch |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2013-02-01 00:16:12 | Re: json api WIP patch |