Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: json api WIP patch

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: json api WIP patch
Date: 2013-02-01 00:26:58
Message-ID: 510B0BD2.4010000@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 01/31/2013 07:16 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2013, at 2:20 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> I'm happy to take opinions about this, and I expected some bikeshedding, but your reaction is contrary to everything others have told me. Mostly they love the operators.
>>
>> I guess that '~>' and '~>>' would work as well as '->' and '->>'.
> Or +> and +>>, since ~ is set very high and small by some fonts (where the fontmakers though of it as a kind of superscript character).
>
> I suppose that := is out of the question?
>


Even if it were I would not on any account use it. As an old Ada 
programmer my mind just revolts at the idea of using this for anything 
but assignment.

cheers

andrew


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2013-02-01 00:32:25
Subject: Re: json api WIP patch
Previous:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2013-02-01 00:16:12
Subject: Re: json api WIP patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group