On 01/31/2013 07:16 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2013, at 2:20 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> I'm happy to take opinions about this, and I expected some bikeshedding, but your reaction is contrary to everything others have told me. Mostly they love the operators.
>>
>> I guess that '~>' and '~>>' would work as well as '->' and '->>'.
> Or +> and +>>, since ~ is set very high and small by some fonts (where the fontmakers though of it as a kind of superscript character).
>
> I suppose that := is out of the question?
>


Even if it were I would not on any account use it. As an old Ada 
programmer my mind just revolts at the idea of using this for anything 
but assignment.

cheers

andrew

In response to

• Re: json api WIP patch at 2013-02-01 00:16:12 from David E. Wheeler

Responses

• Re: json api WIP patch at 2013-02-01 00:32:25 from Tom Lane
• Re: json api WIP patch at 2013-02-01 00:41:11 from Gavin Flower

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2013-02-01 00:32:25
	Subject: Re: json api WIP patch
Previous:	From: David E. Wheeler	Date: 2013-02-01 00:16:12
	Subject: Re: json api WIP patch