Re: Should pg_dump dump larger tables first?

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should pg_dump dump larger tables first?
Date: 2013-01-31 10:15:01
Message-ID: 510A4425.4090608@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/31/2013 2:06 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Loading several big'o'tables in parallel tend not to give benefits in
> the tests I've done so far, but that might be an artefact of python
> multi threading, I will do some testing with proper tooling later.

or insufficient IO parallelism in your disk hardware, file system, etc.

--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bernd Helmle 2013-01-31 10:56:15 Re: pgsql: Improve concurrency of foreign key locking
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2013-01-31 10:06:24 Re: Should pg_dump dump larger tables first?