On 30/01/13 22:23, Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, I'm also wondering if it's really necessary for plpython/plpy_spi.c
> to be looking into spi_priv.h ...
As far as I can tell, it's not necessary, spi.h would be perfectly fine.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Christopher Browne||Date: 2013-01-30 22:37:33|
|Subject: Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2013-01-30 21:35:11|
|Subject: Re: pg_ctl idempotent option|