Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views

From: Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views
Date: 2013-01-29 09:31:31
Message-ID: 510796F3.3050405@joh.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/29/13 10:18 AM, Jeevan Chalke wrote:
>
> That's fine. I am not at all pointing that to you. Have a look at this:

Ugh.. I'm sorry, I don't understand how this happened. I manually
looked through all the changes, but somehow this slipped through. Will
have a look this evening.

Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2013-01-29 09:58:34 Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Previous Message Kohei KaiGai 2013-01-29 09:19:42 Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables