On 01/16/2013 05:59 PM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> I'm looking into this as a committer. It seems that this is the
> newest patch and the reviewer(Pavel) stated that it is ready for
> commit. However, I noticed that this patch adds a Linux/UNIX only
> feature(not available on Windows). So I would like to ask cores if
> this is ok or not.
I haven't been following the thread, but if the complaint is that
Windows doesn't have accurate high-resolution timers, which is what it
kinda looks like from the rest of your message, then it's not true.
Every version since Windows2000 has had
QueryPerformanceCounter()/QueryPerformanceFrequency(). And we use it:
If that's not the problem, then can someone please point me at the
message that sets the problem out clearly, or else just recap it?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2013-01-16 23:42:33|
|Subject: Re: Event Triggers: adding information|
|Previous:||From: Stephen Frost||Date: 2013-01-16 23:31:44|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] COPY .. COMPRESSED|