Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Materialized views WIP patch

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Date: 2013-01-16 19:12:07
Message-ID: 50F6FB87.7040405@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
> Do we really need unlogged MVs in the first iteration?  Seems like
> that's adding a whole bunch of new issues, when you have quite enough
> already without that.

While I think there is strong user demand for unlogged MVs, if we can
get MVs without unlogged ones for 9.3, I say go for that.  We'll add
unlogged in 9.4.


-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2013-01-16 19:20:52
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] Split out xlog reading into its own module called xlogreader
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2013-01-16 18:38:57
Subject: Re: Materialized views WIP patch

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2013-01-16 19:14:45
Subject: pgsql: Split out XLog reading as an independent facility
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2013-01-16 18:38:57
Subject: Re: Materialized views WIP patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group