On 01/13/2013 12:30 PM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> On 01/13/2013 10:49 AM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>> Does this hint that postgreSQL also needs an sameness operator
>> ( "is" or "===" in same languages).
> How do people feel about adding a real sameness operator ?
We'd need to define what "sameness" means. If this goes toward "exact
match in binary representation", this gets a thumbs-up from me.
As a first step in that direction, I'd see adjusting send() and recv()
functions to use a portable binary format. A "sameness" operator could
then be implemented by simply comparing two value's send() outputs.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2013-01-13 18:02:47|
|Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v3 - comparison to Postgres-R
change set format|
|Previous:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2013-01-13 18:01:07|
|Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] unified frontend support for pg_malloc et
al and palloc/pfree mulation (was xlogreader-v4)|