On 01/10/2013 12:35 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> I think there's a very good case for breaking the nexus between
>> PRETTYFLAG_PAREN and PRETTYFLAG_INDENT+line wrapping for views. Only
>> PRETTYFLAG_PAREN affects the safety issue. The others are just about
>> white space in safe places.
> What I was actually thinking about was turning on indent/linewrapping
> all the time (ie, no change on pg_dump's side, just hack ruleutils).
> If we believe it's safe, why not just do it?  It's the paren-removal
> that pg_dump can't tolerate.
>
> 			

Works for me.

cheers

andrew

In response to

• Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views at 2013-01-10 17:35:00 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views at 2013-01-18 06:46:21 from Jeevan Chalke

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Josh Berkus	Date: 2013-01-10 17:54:30
	Subject: Save The Date: Cluster-Hackers meeting May 21st
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2013-01-10 17:35:00
	Subject: Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views