2012-12-11 16:09 keltezéssel, Simon Riggs írta:
> On 11 December 2012 12:18, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
>>>> Such mechanism already exist - you just need to set
>>>> your PGresult pointer to NULL after each PQclear().
>>> So why doesn't PQclear() do that?
>> Because then PQclear() would need a ** not a *. Do you want its
>> interface changed for 9.3 and break compatibility with previous versions?
> No, but we should introduce a new public API call that is safer,
> otherwise we get people continually re-inventing new private APIs that
> Do the Right Thing, as the two other respondents have shown.
How about these macros?
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Marko Kreen||Date: 2013-01-02 15:27:15|
|Subject: Re: allowing multiple PQclear() calls|
|Previous:||From: Claudio Freire||Date: 2013-01-02 14:32:50|
|Subject: Re: default SSL compression (was: libpq compression)|