Re: proposal: ANSI SQL 2011 syntax for named parameters

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: ANSI SQL 2011 syntax for named parameters
Date: 2012-12-28 21:19:57
Message-ID: 50DE0CFD.6060508@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/28/12 11:22 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I am not sure, but maybe is time to introduce ANSI SQL syntax for
> functions' named parameters
>
> It is defined in ANSI SQL 2011
>
> CALL P (B => 1, A => 2)
>
> instead PostgreSQL syntax CALL ( B := 1, A := 2)

I agree it's probably time.

> * should we support both - probably yes

yes

> * how long time we will support pg syntax? - 2..5..ever years
>
> * when we mark pg syntax as obsolete?
>
> * when we remove pg syntax?

The := syntax was introduced in 9.0, so it is by now well entrenched. I
don't think we should remove it at all any time soon.

As for documentation, just state how it is. The standard syntax is =>,
but because of $various_issues, older versions only support :=.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Flower 2012-12-28 21:41:11 Re: proposal: ANSI SQL 2011 syntax for named parameters
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-12-28 21:05:36 Re: multiple CREATE FUNCTION AS items for PLs