> functional gap here. I am not sure I'd bother implementing the
> multi-database concept today if we didn't have it already ... but it
> seems kind of pointless to rip it out given that it's already there.
It's very useful for webhosts. You can give each user their own private
database and not worry about them hacking into other peoples'.
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Palle Girgensohn||Date: 2012-11-05 22:52:21|
|Subject: Re: alter table tablename add column - breaks pl/pgsql function returns tablename|
|Previous:||From: Daniel Farina||Date: 2012-11-05 22:24:10|
|Subject: Re: Synchronous commit not... synchronous?|