Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Synchronous commit not... synchronous?

From: Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>,Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>,Peter van Hardenberg <pvh(at)pvh(dot)ca>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers"<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Synchronous commit not... synchronous?
Date: 2012-11-02 17:51:21
Message-ID: 50940819.5000107@optionshouse.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 11/02/2012 12:31 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:

> If people want full two phase commit, that option exists also.

I was about to say...  isn't that what savepoints are for?


-- 
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 500 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-444-8534
sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com

______________________________________________

See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2012-11-02 18:16:03
Subject: Re: Synchronous commit not... synchronous?
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2012-11-02 17:31:54
Subject: Re: Synchronous commit not... synchronous?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group