| From: | Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Peter van Hardenberg <pvh(at)pvh(dot)ca>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronous commit not... synchronous? |
| Date: | 2012-11-02 17:51:21 |
| Message-ID: | 50940819.5000107@optionshouse.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/02/2012 12:31 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> If people want full two phase commit, that option exists also.
I was about to say... isn't that what savepoints are for?
--
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 500 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-444-8534
sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com
______________________________________________
See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-11-02 18:16:03 | Re: Synchronous commit not... synchronous? |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-11-02 17:31:54 | Re: Synchronous commit not... synchronous? |