Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Regression Test Problems

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Regression Test Problems
Date: 2001-01-18 20:53:44
Message-ID: 5056.979851224@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports
Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com> writes:
>> The fixed-size-array thing sounds like a gotcha waiting to bite someone.

> Agreed.

>> How big is the array, anyway?

> The current size is 100 deep.  Is that sufficient for PostgreSQL or is
> this dependent on usage?

Mumble.  I'd sure you could gin up a scenario where it fails, but
deleting 100 recently-used tables in one transaction doesn't seem like a
very likely situation.

Probably a more interesting question to ask is how graceful is the
behavior when that array fills up?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Jason TishlerDate: 2001-01-18 21:07:05
Subject: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Regression Test Problems
Previous:From: Jason TishlerDate: 2001-01-18 20:01:18
Subject: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Regression Test Problems

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group