Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql: Add defenses to btree and hash index AMs to do simple sanity

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add defenses to btree and hash index AMs to do simple sanity
Date: 2005-11-06 22:31:37
Message-ID: 5051.1131316297@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, 2005-06-11 at 15:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> (gist still needs the same treatment.)

> If you're planning on doing the same for GiST (or if there's some reason
> it can't easily be done), let me know -- otherwise I'll look into doing
> that.

I'm on it now, just felt like committing what I had ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-11-06 22:39:21
Subject: pgsql: Add simple sanity checks on newly-read pages to GiST, too.
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2005-11-06 21:51:04
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add defenses to btree and hash index AMs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group