Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, 2005-06-11 at 15:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> (gist still needs the same treatment.)

> If you're planning on doing the same for GiST (or if there's some reason
> it can't easily be done), let me know -- otherwise I'll look into doing
> that.

I'm on it now, just felt like committing what I had ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: pgsql: Add defenses to btree and hash index AMs at 2005-11-06 21:51:04 from Neil Conway

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2005-11-06 22:39:21
	Subject: pgsql: Add simple sanity checks on newly-read pages to GiST, too.
Previous:	From: Neil Conway	Date: 2005-11-06 21:51:04
	Subject: Re: pgsql: Add defenses to btree and hash index AMs