Re: pg_upgrade's exec_prog() coding improvement

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade's exec_prog() coding improvement
Date: 2012-08-31 16:22:20
Message-ID: 5040E4BC.10904@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 08/31/2012 10:52 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 08/24/2012 11:44 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>
>> Again, win32 testing would be welcome. Sadly, buildfarm does not run
>> pg_upgrade's "make check".
>
>
>
> Yesterday I added a new module to the buildfarm client code to run
> this
> (<https://github.com/PGBuildFarm/client-code/commit/ab812cb9920c65e39ec7358dc816371f1fef31eb>).
> It required a couple of tweaks in the base code. This will be in a new
> buildfarm client release fairly shortly. It's running on crake now,
> and I will add it to pitta to get some Windows coverage.
>

but it's not working on pitta :-(

It will take me some time to work out why, and I have several more
urgent things on my plate. Meanwhile at least we have Linux coverage.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2012-08-31 16:23:02 Re: _USE_32BIT_TIME_T Patch
Previous Message Dave Page 2012-08-31 16:18:51 Re: _USE_32BIT_TIME_T Patch