| From: | Rural Hunter <ruralhunter(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) |
| Date: | 2012-08-28 04:42:30 |
| Message-ID: | 503C4C36.4010204@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
btw, why the mail server rejected me many times? is it marked as
spam?<br>
<div class="moz-forward-container"><br>
-------- 原始消息 --------
<table class="moz-email-headers-table" border="0" cellpadding="0"
cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">主题: </th>
<td>Delivery Status Notification (Failure)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">日期: </th>
<td>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 01:55:01 +0000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">发件人: </th>
<td>Mail Delivery Subsystem
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:mailer-daemon(at)googlemail(dot)com"><mailer-daemon(at)googlemail(dot)com></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">收件人: </th>
<td><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:RuralHunter(at)gmail(dot)com">RuralHunter(at)gmail(dot)com</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<br>
<pre>Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org">pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org</a>
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 unknown address (state 13).
----- Original message -----
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=6c8hoX5Vl3yHCboxcNI156fIiguPMoLh1tgPbdomtCg=;
b=Aedu3K7NmOHqW3YFwwQZu6YCER/DmdMt+xzf1by+41EUWLIgWrgU1QLGm7vYKM06fh
KHXHZ3iAltO2qAzWoYSKqkN8BklyukHf67U1BhUznJLPxT60aGtBGCxW9BbBj9EtTyK5
8Ee0ihOaX1Vce36hTE8N6qmd63TlUguscd+3ScX5djsSpbvhkpFk9wG50BfZRmJN0/dP
zRYyS+sPmqpaO3z3ysefu9SyGnBrHafCfRDEGZ2ahSmvpXgT+OsK4zzJS0QgIoUqli2d
JFdX1Vl12mWBptlA4N6MTzNpg4rAXVWUSyLQOn8A7y4fE9otskZvxwI4QVMUSrLbGZY/
N1Zg==
Received: by 10.66.76.106 with SMTP id j10mr25362006paw.51.1346118900365;
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ruralhunter(at)gmail(dot)com"><ruralhunter(at)gmail(dot)com></a>
Received: from [192.168.1.8] ([116.226.69.188])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id sr3sm15887340pbc.44.2012.08.27.18.54.57
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:503C24EC(dot)3030409(at)gmail(dot)com"><503C24EC(dot)3030409(at)gmail(dot)com></a>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:54:52 +0800
From: Rural Hunter <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ruralhunter(at)gmail(dot)com"><ruralhunter(at)gmail(dot)com></a>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org">pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org</a>
Subject: Analyze on Children Tables
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb18030; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I'm on pg 9.1.3. When I analyze verbose on parent table, I see all the
children are analyzed in the log. But I found the last analyzed time of
children tables are not changed. So my question is, after I analyzed the
parent, should I re-analyze children tables?
</pre>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<br>
</body>
</html>
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| unknown_filename | text/html | 3.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kouber Saparev | 2012-08-28 08:36:21 | Re: Does pg_reset_stats() influence autovacuum? |
| Previous Message | Amador Alvarez | 2012-08-27 19:12:22 | Looking for a better approach for pacemaker, DRDB VS pgsql 9.1 standby feature. |