Looking for a better approach for pacemaker, DRDB VS pgsql 9.1 standby feature.

From: Amador Alvarez <aalvarez(at)d2(dot)com>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Looking for a better approach for pacemaker, DRDB VS pgsql 9.1 standby feature.
Date: 2012-08-27 19:12:22
Message-ID: 503BC696.2080706@d2.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Hi there,
I am setting up a 2 node database cluster (Master/standby) on pgsql 9.1
and it looks to me that drdb option could be easier to maintain & keep
running after several failovers on a row, specially because after a
failover operation it is not too friendly to set back up automatically
the former primary as the new standby. Besides I would not like to
automate an rsync over the same data directory as it could be destroyed
by a 'wrong' syncing .
Any comments are welcome !

Thanks in advance,
A.A.

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rural Hunter 2012-08-28 04:42:30 Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-08-27 13:58:52 Re: [ADMIN] Repeatable crash in pg_dump (with -d2 info)