Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Large block size problems and notes...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Large block size problems and notes...
Date: 2003-10-02 19:10:46
Message-ID: 503.1065121846@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> writes:
> 2) While testing the above, I noted that 65K blocks fail and 32K is as
> big as PostgreSQL can handle, for one reason or another.

15-bit offsets in page item ids.

> but, it seems as though the test at the bottom of
> RelationGetBufferForTuple():
> should be changed to:
>         if (len > MaxTupleSize)

No, it shouldn't.  That test would simply be redundant.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruno Wolff IIIDate: 2003-10-02 19:15:33
Subject: Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3
Previous:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2003-10-02 19:09:12
Subject: Re: Index/Function organized table layout

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group