On 17/08/12 03:45, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:38:09AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On 16.08.2012 17:49, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>>>> On 16.08.2012 17:36, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>>>> In docs, change a few cases of "not important" to
>>>>> FWIW, I don't think these changes were an improvement. I find
>>>>> "not important" more readable in those sentences.
>>>> Really? All of them?
>>> Yes.. Perhaps "not important" just feels better to me in general
>>> than "unimportant".
>> Yeah, it's probably subjective, but for me "unimportant" has
>> negative, dismissive overtones, while "not important" does not.
>> Sort of like the way "unpleasant" has a different meaning than "not
> OK, thanks for the feedback.
I feel the same way.
Even though 'logically' they have the same meaning, I think...
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Nicolas Barbier||Date: 2012-08-18 09:19:54|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] Docs: Make notes on sequences and rollback more obvious|
|Previous:||From: Craig Ringer||Date: 2012-08-18 08:37:01|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] Docs: Make notes on sequences and rollback
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-08-18 18:10:50|
|Subject: pgsql: Another round of planner fixes for LATERAL.|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-08-17 19:40:52|
|Subject: pgsql: Copy-editing for recent window-functions documentation rewrite.|