Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Would like to contribute a section to docs for 9.3. Where to start?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres Documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Would like to contribute a section to docs for 9.3. Where to start?
Date: 2012-08-17 20:03:42
Message-ID: 502EA39E.4040301@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
On 8/15/12 5:33 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
> So here is a very rough draft.  I would be interested in feedback as to
> inaccuracies or omissions.  I would like to get the technical side right
> before going into an editorial phase.
>
> Any feedback on the technical side?

[citation needed]

Seriously, if we are trying to justify our use of seemingly standard 
academic terms, we should have some references to where those are 
defined or at least discussed.  Otherwise we are just begging the 
question: PostgreSQL is object-relational because we say so.



In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Euler TaveiraDate: 2012-08-17 20:29:54
Subject: Re: somewhat wrong archive_command example
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2012-08-17 19:51:44
Subject: Re: somewhat wrong archive_command example

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group