Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql: In docs, change a few cases of "not important" to "unimportant".

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: In docs, change a few cases of "not important" to "unimportant".
Date: 2012-08-16 15:19:39
Message-ID: 502D0F8B.10807@enterprisedb.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
On 16.08.2012 17:49, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:42:45PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> On 16.08.2012 17:36, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> In docs, change a few cases of "not important" to "unimportant".
>>
>> FWIW, I don't think these changes were an improvement. I find "not
>> important" more readable in those sentences.
>
> Really?  All of them?

Yes.. Perhaps "not important" just feels better to me in general than 
"unimportant".

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2012-08-16 15:23:11
Subject: Re: Underspecified window queries in regression tests
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2012-08-16 15:15:24
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Clean up the #include mess a little.

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2012-08-16 15:26:51
Subject: Re: pgsql: In docs, change a few cases of "not important" to "unimportant".
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2012-08-16 15:15:24
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Clean up the #include mess a little.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group