Re: Upgraded Site..any news ?

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <geeks(at)dotgeek(dot)org>, <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Upgraded Site..any news ?
Date: 2004-02-28 08:38:37
Message-ID: 50118.80.177.99.193.1077957517.squirrel@ssl.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

It's rumoured that Marc G. Fournier once said:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> Dave,
>>
>> > We don't own it. PostgreSQL Inc. do (which does make me wonder why
>> > we link directly to it from every page).
>>
>> Well, in theory, they run it for our benefit. We're supposed to get
>> 20% of each sale.
>
> Which, for almost the past year, have been close to zero ... David is
> right, in that the site just plain sucks ... I'm a programmer, and it
> definitely :(
>
> David, if you want to propose a new front end to it, I know I'd
> definitely not argue against it ... :)

What's wrong with the Cafe Press one? The only issue we had there iirc, is
that one of us didn't like the font on some of the merchandise <grin>
/D

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexey Borzov 2004-02-28 15:48:23 Re: Upgraded Site..any news ?
Previous Message elein 2004-02-28 04:14:16 Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal