Re: Qeustion pgadmin2 develop

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: <frank_lupo(at)email(dot)it>
Cc: <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <myeatman(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: Qeustion pgadmin2 develop
Date: 2003-04-02 12:54:59
Message-ID: 50067.80.177.99.193.1049288099.squirrel@ssl.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Hi Frank,

It's rumoured that frank_lupo once said:
> Hi Dave
>
> There are many new functionalities for pgadmin2 that I would want to
> develop.
I wonder if it has sense to make them or of it it is worth
> the pain.
How much time will want that the pgadmin3 before to us
> usable?
> I see that the development and much assets.
> What I must make?

This is something that is of concern to me. pga2 is by no means useless or
at a dead-end, yet I want to concentrate on pga3 as it will allow us to go
cross platform, and handle Unicode - 2 very popular requests which are
seriously hindering pga2
pgAdmin 3 is a fair way from being usable, not least because I have so
little time at the moment. On the other hand, Andreas and Keith have both
been working hard. Realistically, I think it is likely to be 3 - 6 months
before pga3 has the features of pga2 v1.2.
So, I am happy to do a 1.6 release of pga2 seeing as you have put in so
much effort with useful new features. I will leave it up to you to decide
when you have done enough now - just let me know and I'll look at doing a
beta release.
In the long term, if you know C++, it would be great to have your input on
pga3.
What do you (and Mark, Jean-Michel, Keith, Andreas - and anyone else I
forgot) think?
Regards, Dave.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2003-04-02 13:20:07 Re: pgadmin3 query tools
Previous Message Dave Page 2003-04-02 12:44:55 Re: pgadmin3 query tools