Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Best high availability solution ?

From: Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Arnaud Lesauvage" <thewild(at)freesurf(dot)fr>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Best high availability solution ?
Date: 2006-05-31 13:42:05
Message-ID: 5.2.1.1.1.20060531214029.034c03a0@localhost (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
At 10:38 AM 5/31/2006 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:

>Since you're a Windows shop, you may already have the experience (and
>even liceneses perhaps?) to run Microsoft Cluster Service (part of 2003
>Enterprise Edition or 2000 Advanced Server). PostgreSQL will work fine
>with it. Works with shared disks using either fibrechannel or iSCSI.

Are you sure that will really work?

I thought Postgresql requires shared memory amongst the processes. Is that 
not true on the Windows platform?

Does Microsoft Cluster Service somehow help with that?

Regards,
Link.




pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2006-05-31 13:51:12
Subject: Re: Best high availability solution ?
Previous:From: Arnaud LesauvageDate: 2006-05-31 13:40:15
Subject: Re: Best high availability solution ?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group