Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PQunescapeBytea tweak

From: Adam Kavan <akavan(at)cox(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PQunescapeBytea tweak
Date: 2003-10-31 17:05:38
Message-ID: 5.2.1.1.0.20031031110406.00ab5540@pop.central.cox.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
At 09:57 PM 10/30/03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>What compiler and optimization settings are you using, and what is the
>hardware platform?  It seems strange to me that you would get any
>noticeable speedup from this change.  Most C compilers are supposed to
>be reasonably smart about optimizing subscripted pointers.

Whoops, my code was linking against an old 7.3.x version of libpq, the 
speed is the same compared to 7.4.

--- Adam Kavan
--- akavan(at)cox(dot)net 


In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-10-31 21:56:12
Subject: Re: "make check" improvement for cygwin
Previous:From: Larry RosenmanDate: 2003-10-31 15:38:25
Subject: UnixWare UP3 compiler detection patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group