Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] www.postgresql.org

From: Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my>
To: (josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Thomas O'Connell" <tfo(at)monsterlabs(dot)com>)
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] www.postgresql.org
Date: 2003-01-07 15:00:06
Message-ID: 5.1.0.14.1.20030107223311.02e94500@mbox.jaring.my (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-general
I'm in favour of ads if the ads actually generate net benefit to pgsql. 
e.g. If they pay only for clickthroughs it's usually not worth having 
ads[1]. Or the ads use more bandwidth than they pay for.

The new site has broken links to docs:

http://techdocs.postgresql.org/ ->User's Lounge -> Released docs:

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/ <- broken.

The new site also has a broken link to User's lounge - it goes to mirrors.

New site needs link to store.pgsql.com

Link.

[1] Not very likely that people will click on "Harmony Cruises" when they 
are very busy looking for Postgresql info. They may remember the name for 
later, but not click through.

At 11:05 AM 1/6/03 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:

>Personally, I'm in favor of ads if it is needed to offset the cost of 
>hosting,
>and as long as the advertisers are companies which support Open Source.
>
>In fact, I was thinking of buying an ad myself.
>
>--
>-Josh Berkus
>  Aglio Database Solutions
>  San Francisco
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster



In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Steve LittDate: 2003-01-07 15:49:53
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] www.postgresql.org
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2003-01-07 10:06:08
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Thank-you to Cybertec Geschwinde & Schonig

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Stephan SzaboDate: 2003-01-07 15:27:49
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] 7.3.1 index use / performance
Previous:From: Justin CliftDate: 2003-01-07 14:21:37
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL on e10k

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group