Re: Client/Server compression?

From: Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>
Cc: Kyle <kaf(at)nwlink(dot)com>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Client/Server compression?
Date: 2002-03-17 11:47:33
Message-ID: 5.1.0.14.1.20020317194454.02d3ed90@192.228.128.13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

You can also use stunnel for SSL. Preferable to having SSL in postgresql
I'd think.

Cheerio,
Link.

At 03:38 PM 3/16/02 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

>FWIW, I was not in favor of the SSL addition either, since (just as you
>say) it does nothing that couldn't be done with an SSH tunnel. If I had

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2002-03-17 13:50:07 Another misinformed article
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2002-03-17 00:56:48 7.2 crash...