Thanks for replies Mark, however your 'quoting' of my email was up the
spout and so I had trouble working out where your replies were separate
from my quotes.
At 01:10 07/03/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>[mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Tim Finch,
>Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:08 PM
>Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] ViewDesigner Code
>Thanks, got the code and installed it. Am i right in thinking you have not
>doen any work yet to draw objects in the top pane for the
>I did throw a copy of the control I was working on into the top pane just to
>see if I was on the right track. It seemed like it would work, so I took it
>out for the time being until the control is finished.
>I saw a lot of stub procedures for many operations all which launch a new
>window - I guess you cut/paste a lot of code, huh?
>Yeah, I did, for devel purposes. I don't plan on keeping it that way. The
>plan is to have each View Designer window self-sufficient until the user is
>ready to create the view, at which time the view definition would be sent to
>the existing new view dialog box for naming and commenting, etc.
>Any hints on getting anything work that DOES work so far? I managed to load
>a .SQL file and see the coloured syntax SQL in pane 3 but nothing in panes
>1,2,4 - is that right?
>Correct, it doesn't actually do anything productive at this time, unless you
>count loading and saving a .sql file productive. :)
>Great to have something already started on this feature, as it will give us
>all a chance to get places. I can forsee needing a CVS facility for it
>sooner rather than later. Do you anticipate seeing it as a add-in module a
>la Excel exporter etc. In this case it would fit very nicely into the
>plugins folder on the existing CVS.
>No, I think it would be better as a menu option/icon, just like the `execute
>arbitrary sql` feature. The reason it is the way it is now is the plugins
>in the version I have right now are broken, and won't load right.
>Dave, who do you deal with to get the pgadmin CVS facility arranged with to
>see about the idea of partial upload facility for Mark & I?? Exchanging
>Zips of code with instructions to merge in is barmy when CVS exists and is
>already used for this project? Alternatively, Mark, could we get a slot on
>Sourceforge/OSDN in the short term?
>I don't see why we couldn't get a spot at SF, if it is not possible or
>practical to use the existing CVS.
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
In response to
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2002-03-07 11:32:55|
|Subject: Re: table OCX control|
|Previous:||From: Tim Finch||Date: 2002-03-07 11:18:26|
|Subject: Re: Devel / Release on same pc / Mark's ZIP|