Re: vacuum and 24/7 uptime

From: Ryan Mahoney <ryan(at)paymentalliance(dot)net>
To: Mark <mark(at)ldssingles(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuum and 24/7 uptime
Date: 2001-07-11 16:46:56
Message-ID: 5.0.2.1.0.20010711174402.03077060@paymentalliance.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc

Hi Mark, This is being worked on now. I believe the 7.2 release will have
enable you to run a vacuum with no downtime.

-r

At 03:39 PM 7/11/01 -0600, Mark wrote:

>Is Postgresql ready for 24/7 uptime? Our tests have shown that vacuumdb
>requires downtime, and if one does this nightly as suggested, well, one has
>downtime, 40+ minutes in our case.
>
>My company wants to replace MS SQL Server with PostgreSQL, but we can't
>afford downtime to do database maintenance. Is it possible that we are doing
>something wrong?
>
>What are the plans for future versions of pgsql? Will vacuum be optomized or
>otherwise enhanced to execute more quickly and/or not lock tables?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Mark
>
>PS
>I posted more details to the hackers list.
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
>
>
>
>---
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.251 / Virus Database: 124 - Release Date: 4/26/01

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 166 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-07-11 16:51:59 Re: Performance tuning for linux, 1GB RAM, dual CPU?
Previous Message Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos 2001-07-11 16:44:33 Re: Postgresql revisited. Some questions about the product0

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-07-11 17:40:59 RE: jdbc and unix signals
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2001-07-11 16:14:58 RE: JDBC and stored procedures