Re: timestamp/function question

From: Soma Interesting <dfunct(at)telus(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: timestamp/function question
Date: 2001-03-29 17:07:17
Message-ID: 5.0.2.1.0.20010329090322.02190e88@pop.telus.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

At 10:56 AM 3/29/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Because you asked for a value based on the current *date*.
>If you waited till tomorrow and tried again, then you'd get a
>different answer. Perhaps you want
>
> RETURN date_part(''epoch'', CURRENT_TIMESTAMP);

Thank you Tom!

Thank-you! Thank-you! Thank-you! Thank-you!

How can I possibly thank you enough?! I want you to know how much I
appreciate your answers because I'll have more questions for you one day...

I love postgres, but I hate your documentation... (that doesn't mean I
don't read it however).

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message will trillich 2001-03-29 17:07:50 Re: inconsistent functionality with LIKE operator
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-03-29 17:06:32 Re: Pgsql-7.1RC1: SET SEED = <something>