From: | "Atri Sharma" <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'John R Pierce'" <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Regarding GSoc Application |
Date: | 2012-04-11 06:26:51 |
Message-ID: | 4f852432.e1da440a.01db.60dd@mx.google.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
>see dblink ofr an example API
>http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/dblink.html
>
>the 'pljava fdw functions' are the publicly visible pljava functions
>implementing your api... while my 'pljava code' are additional
>functions/methods you use internally that aren't visible externally
>
>
Hi John,
Thanks for the link and advice.
Ok,now I think I got your point.The Pl/Java FDW functions are what are used
for the public FDW API....while Pl/Java code actually does the job,but it is
hidden from the user.The user actually never gets to talk to the SQL part of
the FDW,so he cannot cause much harm,right?
If my understanding is correct,I think it will be a sweet solution.
Please let me know your opinion.
Atri
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | 乔志强 | 2012-04-11 06:31:13 | Re: [streaming replication] 9.1.3 streaming replication bug ? |
Previous Message | Atri Sharma | 2012-04-11 06:22:35 | Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2012-04-11 14:36:58 | Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application |
Previous Message | Atri Sharma | 2012-04-11 06:22:35 | Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application |