Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Regarding GSoc Application

From: "Atri Sharma" <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "'John R Pierce'" <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>,<pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Regarding GSoc Application
Date: 2012-04-11 06:26:51
Message-ID: 4f852432.e1da440a.01db.60dd@mx.google.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-jdbc
>see dblink ofr an example API
>http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/dblink.html
>
>the 'pljava fdw functions' are the publicly visible pljava functions 
>implementing your api... while my 'pljava code' are additional 
>functions/methods you use internally that aren't visible externally
>
>

Hi John,

Thanks for the link and advice.

Ok,now I think I got your point.The Pl/Java FDW functions are what are used
for the public FDW API....while Pl/Java code actually does the job,but it is
hidden from the user.The user actually never gets to talk to the SQL part of
the FDW,so he cannot cause much harm,right?

If my understanding is correct,I think it will be a sweet solution.

Please let me know your opinion.

Atri




In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: 乔志强Date: 2012-04-11 06:31:13
Subject: Re: [streaming replication] 9.1.3 streaming replication bug ?
Previous:From: Atri SharmaDate: 2012-04-11 06:22:35
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2012-04-11 14:36:58
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application
Previous:From: Atri SharmaDate: 2012-04-11 06:22:35
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group